Railroad-crossing
statistics for the year 2005 have been issued by the Federal
Railroad Administration, with the result being a continuation
of the flattening in the accident rate. As shown below,
while the nation-wide accident rate in 2005 declined a
bit from 2004, it is higher than in 2003. Furthermore,
Year |
Number
of U.S. Accidents |
2002 |
3,077 |
2003 |
2,976 |
2004 |
3,067 |
2005 |
3,010 |
the 3,010 accidents
equates to the average figure over the past four years.
Similar results have occurred in Ohio, as follows:
Year |
Number
of Ohio Accidents |
2002 |
141 |
2003 |
126 |
2004 |
139 |
2005 |
133 |
In that railroad-crossing
accidents have been steadily declining since federal/State
programs dedicated to safety were established in the early
1970’s, the question arises as to whether or not
some change in direction is needed which would address
the so-called “high-hanging” as opposed to
the already-plucked “low-hanging” fruit. While
the continued installation of gates (the safest device)
is certainly worthwhile, there appears to be needed change
in the approach to traffic-law enforcement.
Up to this point,
the major educational safety program – Operation
Lifesaver – has focused solely on motorist responsibilities
and ensuing enforcement of traffic laws at railroad crossings.
Efforts have included the placement of police on trains
to observe motorist behavior, the ticketing of drivers
for alleged violation of State traffic laws, and the encouragement
of judges to strictly enforce crossing laws relating to
motorists. And yet, no attention has been given to the
enforcement of railroad responsibilities at such crossings.
Five areas of railroad enforcement come to mind, and although
local and State police cannot give citations to railroads
for illegal behavior, they can notify both the offenders
and appropriate agencies in order to lessen future violations.
- Speeding
trains: Railroad speed limits are established
by the Federal Railroad Administration based on the
classification of track. The maximum speed of freight
trains is often 60 miles-per-hour, but passenger
trains (Amtrak) may travel at up to 80 miles-per-hour. (49CFR213.9)
- Whistle
blowing: Based on federal law, locomotive
engineers must blow whistles in a continuous sequence
of two longs, a short, and a long, starting at 15-20
seconds before the train approaches the crossing. (49CFR222.21)
- Blocked
crossing: Ohio law limits trains from blocking
crossings to five minutes, unless the situation is
beyond the control of the railroad. (ORC5589.21)
- Motor
sight obstructions: Ohio law requires
railroads to remove obstructive vegetation for
600 feet up and down the track from the crossing, along the
railroad right-of-way (usually a width of
33-75 feet on each side of the crossing). (ORC4955.36)
- Activation
failure: Where gate mechanisms fail, federal
law requires (in many cases) railroads to provide alternative
safety such as a flagman. (49CFR234.7) Activation
failures are to be reported to the federal government.
While the Federal
Railroad Administration and Ohio State authorities (especially
the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio and local jurisdictions)
have the authority to enforce the above laws, there is
significant evidence that each of the five laws have been
violated. In fact, motorist sight obstructions have been
formally documented at a number of unprotected (non-gated)
crossings. Other violations have been noted from
observation and in judicial proceedings. No matter, educational
entities such as Operation Lifesaver – who encourage,
if not induce, law enforcement to fulfill their duties – can
do the same when it comes to railroad legal requirements
and regulatory-agency authority.
In the case of
railroad crossings, law enforcement is a two-way street.
Both motorists and railroads are required to comply with
traffic laws. To concentrate on the enforcement of motorist
traffic laws, while ignoring railroad laws, is to implicitly
blame motorists for crossing accidents. Such an imbalance
in traffic-law enforcement is a disservice to safety in
general and Ohioans in particular. It is past time for
Operation Lifesaver to change its ways in regard to one
of its three-E programs – Enforcement – and
develop a balanced program that recognizes the responsibilities
of both motorists and railroads. |