Letter to Editor
The Repository
August 29, 2004
STOP SIGNS ACTUALLY CAN MAKE
RAIL CROSSINGS LESS SAFE
Regarding “Ohio among few states failing to boost safety at rail
crossings”
(Aug, 20): Ohioans shouldn’t take lightly the dangerous recommendation
the National Transportation Safety Board made for installing stop signs
at crossings without gates.
While NTSB is correct that Ohio ranks traditionally as one
of the top 10 states for train-car accidents and fatalities,
its so-called “cheaper
alternative”
won’t save lives. It will, however, reduce railroads’ liability
for future accidents and fatalities, and eliminate any railroad maintenance
costs for safety equipment at crossings.
In 2000, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (Norfolk Southern v.
Shanklin) that
“the use of federal funds in the installation of crossings warning
devices was sufficient to preempt state law in the selection and installation
of adequate warning devices….What states cannot do, once they have
installed federally funded devices, is hold the railroads responsible
for the adequacy of those devices.” The crossing in this case had
only a crossbuck.
A movement is under way to pass legislation to require stop signs at
all passive crossings. Passive crossings, without gates, are generally
those with low vehicle traffic compared to high train traffic and account
for the majority of all train-car accidents. If federal funds are used
to install stop signs, the same preemption would apply.
The Federal Highway Administration is aware stop signs can
make a crossing less safe. Federal highway rules state stop
signs are allowed at crossings only if the stop sign doesn’t
affect the safety of the crossing. This statement demonstrates
knowledge by safety engineers that stop signs reduce safety.
In addition, recommended minimum sight distances are realized
using a moving vehicle, not a stopped vehicle.
One fact cannot be disputed: Numerous transportation, safety and government
studies prove properly functioning gates are 90 percent effective in
preventing accidents and fatalities. The question should be why is the
NTSB recommending stop signs?
VICKY L. MOORE
Salineville
Trustee, Angels on Track Foundation/Crossing To Safety
http://www.angelsontrack.org/rep082904.html
©2006 The Angels on Track Foundation.
All rights reserved. | Trademark &
Copyright Notice | Site Map |